netmouse | zer_netmouse tweets of the day

13:22 Ginjer Buchanan is right - she has edited bazillions of books. #
13:28 @fabulouslorraine "Homecoming" should be in _From the Dust Returned_ (orig in the New Yorker Halloween issue for 1946) #
13:30 stayed up late last night filling out details on Ginjer's wiki page, bit.ly/ido0U #
13:38 @fabulouslorrain also in The Stories of Ray Bradbury #
13:42 @fabulouslorrain "Homecoming" should be in _From the Dust Returned_ (orig in the New Yorker Halloween issue for 1946) #
15:02 @mactavish I studied Spanish in school & college & went to Spain once. Just try to keep my hand in. So to speak. #
15:05 @Jodyth no kidding. I was looking up Charlaine Harris last night while people on LJ were babbling about True Blood - Ginjer's her editor. #
15:09 Plus of course Charlie Stross, Jack McDevitt, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, Sharon Shinn. @Jodyth which ones stood out to you? #
15:10 @chr0me oo, nice green icon in support of #iranelection . Good idea. #
17:18 @Vaguery I think if you're local you should go see Manolete play at Top of the Park at 7 pm tonight... ... I wish I was local. #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

I get the impression there are a number of book editors who are rather more like producers, at least with some of their authors. They enable the books and make them happen, but don't necessarily do much artistic direction.

Maybe we need a different term for that. To distinguish them from the editors who, like, actively edit. I think it varies a little on a per-project basis, though.

zer_netmouse tweets of the day

no subject