netmouse | (no subject)

Kucinich calls for recount in NH.

In the last year not a lot of people have been talking about the fact that two years ago lots of watchdog groups were saying we were not ready to have a presidential election we could depend on--many of the electronic ballot-counting systems were actually worse at the time (for accountability) than New Hampshire's, which at least appears to keep a copy of a physical ballot. I'm not sure how far we've gotten since then.

One analysis group reports of the NH primary that comparison of *some* hand-counted ballots with *all* the electronic ballots show eerily switched percentages for Obama and Clinton compared to the total count reported. What's that Scalzi was just saying about how hard Clinton would fight for this election? Seriously, though, numbers do weird things sometimes. It's not always a conspiracy. But I'd like to see a recount like this done at a time when no one can argue the whole national economy is waiting with baited breath for the results and that therefore (this argument never held water for me) we have to stop counting the votes. Please, please, please, let's not have another Florida/Ohio/etc. situation. This is America. We really ought to be able to get this voting thing down. It's not really that complicated.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Yeah, when the 2000 presidential election was stolen, it was pilfered by old people in black robes with pens and gavels, not leather-booted Cossacks with bayonet- fixed Kalashnikovs.
'cause weez Civilized.

Ah. Well, my theory on that is that you should inform Mr. Gore that if you don't want to have the elections decided by a court, don't file a lawsuit.

We shouldn't fight about that here, however. Let's pick my blog or yours if we're going to duke this out.

Fair. I'd say let it drop: I cannot imagine any conclusion that's going to satisfy anyone on that topic, anyways.
No offense.

No offense offered, and no offense taken.

Appreciated, particularly in the current climate.