![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
A meditation from Shadow Puppets by Orson Scott Card
In the college she had briefly attended, [...] she had quickly realized that intellectuals seemed to think that their life --the life of the mind, the endless self-examination, the continuous autobiography afflicted upon all comers-- was somehow higher than the repetitive, meaningless lives of the common people.
Virlomi knew the opposite to be true. The intellectuals in the university were all the same. They had precisely the same deep thoughts about exactly the same shallow emotions and trivial dilemmas. They knew this, unconsciously, themselves. When a real event happened, something that shook them to the heart, they withdrew from the game of university life, for reality had to be played out on a different stage.
In the villages, life was about life, not about one-upmanship and display. Smart people were valued because they could solve problems, not because they could speak pleasingly about them.
(p 298-299, hardback edition.)
no subject
no subject
I also felt a little bit longer denoument would have been nice. The book ends pretty suddenly. I don't find myself interested in a whole 'nother sequel, but I want to know what happens immediately next in a few people's lives. (so I will probably read another sequel if he puts one out, hoping it resolves that issue... but I''m not sure he would write it)
no subject
Re:
I agree with the pacing, too, though. There were other sections of the book where it just didn't seem to gel. And I did want more info about the immediate anticlimax as well. However, I have to admit, both here and at the climax of "Lost Boys," Card had me practically jumping out of my seat screaming. He's the only writer yet to do that to me.
no subject
But you're talking about the sysadmin hired by Peter Wiggin, the Hegemon. Supposedly one of the smartest, most well-connected people in the world in the context of the book. He shouldn't be hiring stupid only superficially qualified people.
Re:
Besides, Peter thought he could handle Achilles as well. While VERY brilliant, Peter DOES make mistakes. AND we're talking about a beauracracy here. Peter can't handle EVERY aspect. His security man could have been picked by his current IT head who owed a favor to the VP of Internation Affairs, whose cousin was a decent hand with Network Security. *shrugs* Who knows?
no subject
but the individuals who know what they're doing are still out there, and will still be out there. Five of my best friends, including my husband, would be better at computer security than this guy. The circle of my best friends is not a very large sample size in which to observe that computer security people vastly better than the person described are easy to find.
I think Card attempts to depict the computer security person as someone who made a wacky mistake, rather than as someone who was incompetent. It just doesn't ring true to me at all. In Ender's game, they didn't catch onto how Ender was hacking the computer system at first, but then they weren't really watching him. Here, Card repeatedly talks about how they put in systems to monitor everything Achilles does on the computers, but then when he actually describes what was in place, and the failure of it, the system doesn't stand up to his description -to the expectations of a medium computer geek.
no subject
Speaking up for people who can speak pleasingly about problems....
B
no subject
Fuck you too, Mr. C; we like you, but are sad you feel this way about us...
no subject
no subject