Oh, they don't have to. I mean, the time will come when they are like "LOOK! We took a poll and people are 7-to-1 AGAINST businesses that push a homosexual agenda! Look right here! We have a POLL!"
Neverminding the fact that A) the poll question and it's lead-up paragraph are so biased as to be laughable and B) the sampling population is "people who visit the AFA website."
I'd hate to see the results if some "outsider" *HADN'T* seen it and brought other people around.
I think it's telling that even when I was a good little line-toeing church boy growing up in the conservative Deep South... I STILL hated the AFA.
*nod* They don't, indeed, and yet, I wouldn't bet on it being technically correct, either - if the poll gets sweeped up by liberal populations outraged with the blatant bias and the conservative folk find it just another blah poll, they could find themselves in an embarrassing situation.
Those results are rigged - they only sent the poll out to their followers. Someone saw it and forwarded it to me and other, as I forwarded it and now Netmouse has done; that way, we begin to normalize their results a bit.
If they even choose to look at any results except the ones they want to see, that is.
no subject
'scuse me while I go scrub my hands.
no subject
:-D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I didn't need to know that. I really didn't.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Neverminding the fact that A) the poll question and it's lead-up paragraph are so biased as to be laughable and B) the sampling population is "people who visit the AFA website."
I'd hate to see the results if some "outsider" *HADN'T* seen it and brought other people around.
I think it's telling that even when I was a good little line-toeing church boy growing up in the conservative Deep South... I STILL hated the AFA.
no subject
no subject
If they even choose to look at any results except the ones they want to see, that is.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject