netmouse: (Default)
netmouse ([personal profile] netmouse) wrote2005-03-06 01:15 pm

Another Sunny Day

Today I am having trouble motivating myself to go down in the basement and sand the trim and the stairs, given how lovely the sunshine is. For lunch I sat in the sun and read and ate, sitting among my plants in the livng room, and it was just lovely. I did the same thing yesterday - yesterday I finished Marvel 1602 and today I finally finished Starlight 2.

It's been a long time since I spent the greater part of a day reading fiction. This weekend I've also been editing a couple things as I read them on my laptop. -Which reminds me, I've been wondering, aren't we at the point where the final typsetting of things is done electronically? Is there a reason why the publisher shouldn't return a copyedited version of a book or story in electronic form to the author?
vaxjedi: (Default)

[personal profile] vaxjedi 2005-03-06 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The only issue really, would be control of the electronic copy - do you want extra PDFs of your book floating around? Of course, with Adobe's Policy server, you can fix that. But thats new and a shitload of money.
ext_13495: (Default)

[identity profile] netmouse.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
well, but it should be easy to bind the author not to pass it around - and the author is presumably motivated not to do some anyway.

And actually, what I was proposing isn't so much that they should get a nice pretty copy of their book or story, as that they should get a corrected copy - with spelling and punctuation errors and such removed. The text that goes into the final layout. It doesn't seem that there's an extra cost associated with passing that back to the author once it exists, though you're right, there's a little extra risk.

ext_12542: My default bat icon (Default)

[identity profile] batwrangler.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)
If our authors ask, we send them the final text in pdf form (since they generally don't have access to Ventura, our primary typesetting program, or Quark, our secondary typesetting program). Not many of them have asked, though.
ext_13495: (Default)

[identity profile] netmouse.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
really? I would think they would prefer .rtf to .pdf

ext_12542: My default bat icon (Default)

[identity profile] batwrangler.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
The final, correct version exists in the typesetting program (so .vp or .qxd rather than as .rtf or .doc) and gets converted to .pdf for the printer (our primary printer is going DTP from the .pdfs). We *could* convert it to .rtf (probably by cropping the headers and footers off the pdf and having Acrobat "save as") but we're all wearing multiple hats as it is and thankfully, haven't had to.
ext_13495: (Default)

[identity profile] netmouse.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
*nod* thanks for explaining.