netmouse: (Default)
netmouse ([personal profile] netmouse) wrote2004-07-22 11:06 am

a small disappointment

You know how, when you watch movies, you can get distracted sometimes by the special effects? Especially if there's a mistake? I have started to get distracted by the editing in books, usually to my disappointment.

On the whole, having got into it a bit slowly, I have been enjoying Blind Lake. I'm getting near the end. The end is always less effectively edited than the rest of a book. I had just passed a missing article a few pages back, and then I stumbled on this inconsistency:

p 354

"[...]her first real long-term relationship, a university affair with a man named Mike Okuda who had also been obsessed with O/BEC images and who once admitted fantasizing, as they made love, that he was under invisible surveillance from other worlds"


"wait," I thought, and flipped backward...


p 205

"Ray had been not only her first husband but her first lover."


So I checked in the front of the book.



"Edited by Teresa Nielsen Hayden"


And I sighed.

I'll finish the book. I might even vote for it for the Hugo. But I'm disappointed, especially since I'm convinced that, given time and the chance to give something her full attention, Teresa is one of the best editors out there.

[identity profile] bjorng.livejournal.com 2004-07-23 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I have the same reaction to poor copy-editing. Plot inconsistencies can get me as well, but mostly it's typos and similar basic errors that throw me out of the story. That was my biggest gripe with Cryptonomicon -- my hardcover has at least a dozen typos in it.

I know that copyediting is an arduous task. I've done it myself, and my g/f does it professionally. But my feeling is, if you're going to do it, do it right!

As an aside, I think that MS-word is the greatest bane to good editing that has ever been created. If an author uses it, the source material can be severely damaged by bad assumptions that its autocorrection system makes. If a copy-editor uses it, the classic M*ft "we know what's best, so shut up and take it" effect its features have cause more harm than good. On the upside, I think its autocorrect function has drastically increased the use of the word "impute", at least in emails that I regularly see that should be asking for "input". :)