Well, and I do wish you had said that in your post or would go edit it or follow it up and say that now.

I've been really frustrated at the logical line that seems to have blurred, where people don't seem to see the difference between saying "Ew! Those people were awful, that must have sucked, people were obviously imposed upon because it would have been impossible for it to have been all right, those women were taken advantage of by it and all the men were only in it to cop a feel!" and saying "I don't think I would like this and here are concerns it raises for me."

In other words, the difference between people who weren't there making assertions about what the event must have been like (and attacking the people who were part of it) or expressing opinions about the concept and possible future applications of it.