First, I recognize that it's very likely that all of the delegates in Michigan won't count at all.
However.
If, by some chance, it turns out that Michigan (and, for that matter, Florida) will get to use their delegates, isn't it unfair to use that dispertion of delegates among Hillary and Uncommitted? I personally would prefer them not to count at all. If we had a normal primary and all of the possible candidates were on the ballot, we would have had much higher voter turnout, and Hillary would have received much fewer votes. To me, it is highly suspect to even think about using Michigan delegates based on the primary we had. I say, if they're even going to think about using delegates from Michigan and Florida, we need to re-do our state primary election completely.
That was probably unprovoked, but I felt the need to get that off my chest. I feel a little better. :)
no subject
First, I recognize that it's very likely that all of the delegates in Michigan won't count at all.
However.
If, by some chance, it turns out that Michigan (and, for that matter, Florida) will get to use their delegates, isn't it unfair to use that dispertion of delegates among Hillary and Uncommitted? I personally would prefer them not to count at all. If we had a normal primary and all of the possible candidates were on the ballot, we would have had much higher voter turnout, and Hillary would have received much fewer votes. To me, it is highly suspect to even think about using Michigan delegates based on the primary we had. I say, if they're even going to think about using delegates from Michigan and Florida, we need to re-do our state primary election completely.
That was probably unprovoked, but I felt the need to get that off my chest. I feel a little better. :)