In case you missed it: the D-word looms eerily
Jim posts about President Bush's new war adviser saying in an interview on NPR that he thinks we should certainly consider re-instating the draft.
In case anyone's wondering, I would be, uh, against that. I think any conflict where an insufficient number of our youngsters (and other healthy people) are willing to go in service is a conflict we shouldn't be involved in. That's aside from the whole question of whether or not there are better approaches to conflict than fighting, much of the time.
In case anyone's wondering, I would be, uh, against that. I think any conflict where an insufficient number of our youngsters (and other healthy people) are willing to go in service is a conflict we shouldn't be involved in. That's aside from the whole question of whether or not there are better approaches to conflict than fighting, much of the time.

no subject
I'm not sure I agree that a national Draft would never be an appropriate government response to situations that threaten the lives of American or World citizens. (It's easy for me to say that, now, in my old age. Certainly, I didn't want them to get me in the Vietnam years, and was also intellectually/morally opposed to what the United States did in that action. What Bush and Cheney have committed this country to is even more senseless. But if we were faced with a situation like the one in WWII, I would acknowedge the U.S. government's legitimate claim to ask for my service. I'm not sure they could ever get me to point a gun at someone and fire it. I'd probably wind up in a noncombat assignment or in prison.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
To me, it doesn't sound like this is being looked at as a likely option - it sounds more like he just doesn't want to rule it out. Note also that he never uses the word "seriously".
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)